Woman's Corset

IMG_2893.jpeg
IMG_2890.jpeg
IMG_2896.jpeg
IMG_2885.jpeg
IMG_2891.jpeg
IMG_2892.jpeg

Subject

Clothing and Dress

Title

Woman's Corset

Date

ca. 1880

Description

Every article of female linen, all those white under-things that are usually concealed, were here displayed, in a suite of rooms, classed in various departments. The corsets and dress-improvers occupied one counter, there were stitched corsets, the Duchesse, the cuirass, and above all, white silk corsets, dove-tailed with colours, forming for this day a special display; an army of dummies without heads or legs, nothing but the bust, dolls’ breasts flattened under the silk, and close by, on other dummies, were horse-hair and other dress improvers, prolonging these broomsticks into enourmous, distended croups, of which the profile assume a ludicrous unbecomingness.”

Some of the first fitted ready-made garments in production were corsets. One of the most successful American companies was the Royal Worcester Corset Company. Founded as the Worcester Skirt Company in Worcester, Massachusetts in 1861 by David Hale Fanning, the company initially specialized in the production of hoopskirts. By March 1, 1872, the company had shifted focus in production toward corsets due to changing fashions in women's dress. The Royal Worcester Corset Company closed its doors in 1950. President E.A. Meister donated a collection of 171 corsets to the Brooklyn Museum of Art in memory of his father-in-law and former Royal Worcester Corset Company president Isodor Roth, who assembled the collection. The collection now resides in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Fashions of the Victorian period called for the use of the corset in order to accommodate the longer, hourglass shape of bodices instead of the shorter stays that had been used in previous decades. Corsets follow the contours of the body, while stays are rigid and were meant to provide a flattened appearance of the front of the woman's torso. Whalebone busks and boning were replaced with structures curved with wood or metal. Both stays and the corset push up the bosom. Modesty for women was a prevalent Victorian value, and the marketing of undergarments reflected these values, simultaneously pushing the envelope ever so slightly. Illustrations of disembodied torsos to model the garments reduced any perceived identity of the wearer to merely a dress form.

Corsets were primarily utilitarian garments, offering support for posture, the creation of a desired silhouette for women of a particular social class, and a tool of societal norms imposed on women. The impetus of the corseting had historically been the cinching of the waist to create the socially desired small waist. With the death of Queen Victoria and an approaching new century, social activism scrutinized undergarments. The traditional view, that stays/corsetry were beneficial to a woman's moral character and physical health, was challenged by groups such as the Pre-Raphaelites, the Rational Dress Movement, and the Healthy and Artistic Dress Union. Corset alternatives such as the “health corset” were developed to address the medical issues. By 1910 the bust was not supported or covered by corseting. The "S" shape curve took form in lingerie, emphasizing a different bust shape and slim lines as a result of the lighter fabrics used in dress.

The study of corsets during the twentieth century connected corsets and the act of corseting to sexuality. This idea suggests that by enhancing the female form into fashionable silhouettes, corsets provide the wearer a level of physical attraction associated with the Eurocentric feminine ideal, an aspiration to be at her most desirable. It becomes a tool to shape the body, creating an alternative "fashion body."

References

Chenoune, Farid. Underneath It All: A Century of French Lingerie. New York: Rizzoli International Publications, 1999. 

Freud, Hanna. Corsets and Dress-Cutting Systems, Etc. Report on the Committee of Awards of the World's Columbian Commission: Special Reports Upon Special Subjects or Groups In Two Volumes. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1901. Web. Accessed April 6, 2014.

Kidwell, Claudia B. & Christman, Margaret C. Suiting Everyone: The Democratization of Clothing In America. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1974.

Metropolitan Museum of Art, online collections search: http://www.metmuseum.org/collections/search-the-collections. Web. Accessed April 6, 2014.

Probert, Christina. Lingerie in Vogue Since 1910. New York: Abbeville Press, 1981.

Stall-Meadows, Celia E. Why Would Anyone Wear That?: Fascinating Fashion Facts. Bristol, UK: Intellect, 2013. 

Steele, Valerie. The Corset: A Cultural History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.

Waugh, Norah. Corsets and Crinolines. New York: Routledge/Theater Arts Books, 1954/2004.

Worcester Historical Museum. Worcester’s Industrial Heritage. Plant Closings: http://www.worcesterhistory.org/enterprise-4d-closings.html. Web. Accessed April 6, 2014.

Zola, Emile. The Ladies’ Paradise. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1992. 

 

Contributor

Raúl Cornier

Creator

Royal Worcester

Citation

Royal Worcester, “Woman's Corset,” Historic Textile and Costume Collection, accessed May 2, 2024, https://uritextilecollection.omeka.net/items/show/446.